Intergovernmentalism: Old, Liberal, and New (2023)

  • Bickerton, C. J. (2012). European integration: From nation-states to member states. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722.

  • Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). Something new: A rejoinder to Frank Schimmelfennig on the new intergovernmentalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 731–736.

  • Bulmer, S. (1983). Domestic politics and European policy-making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(4), 349–63.

  • Cameron, D., & Simeon, R. (2002). Intergovernmental relations in Canada: The emergence of collaborative federalism. Review of Federalism, 32(2), 49–71.

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1999) Toward a normal science of regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(1): 160-164.

  • Caporaso, J. A. and Keeler, J. T. S. (1995). The European Union and regional integration theory. In C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (Eds.), The state of the European Union: Building a European polity? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 29–62.

  • Cini, M. (2016). Intergovernmentalism. In M. Cini & N. P.-S. Borragán (Eds.), European Union Politics (pp. 65–78).

  • Corbey, D. (1993). Stilstand is Vooruitgang: De Dialectiek van het Europese Integratieproces. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

  • Corbey, D. (1995). Dialectical functionalism: Stagnation as a booster of European integration. International Organization, 49(2), 253–284.

  • Cronin, B. (2002). The two faces of the United Nations: The tension between intergovernmentalism and transnationalism. Global Governance, 8(1), 53–71.

  • Davignon, E. (2006). Foreword. In J.-M. Palayret, H. Wallace, & P. Winand (Eds.), Visions, votes, and vetoes: The empty chair crisis and the Luxembourg (pp. 15–19). Brussels, Belgium: Peter Lange.

  • De Vree, J. K. (1972). Political integration: The formation of theory and its problems. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

  • Dehousse, R. (2011). Conclusion: Obstinate or obsolete? In R. Dehousse (Ed.), The “community method.” Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1954). Political community at the international level: Problems of definition and measurement. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1957). Political community and the North American area. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Deutsch, K. W., Burrell, S. A., Kann, R. A., Lee, M., Lichtenman, L., Raymond E., Loewenheim, F. L., & Van Wagenen, R. W. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Deutsch, K. W., Edinger, L. J., Macridis, R. C., & Merritt, R. L. (1967). France, Germany and the Western alliance: A study of elite attitudes on European integration and world politics. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

  • Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L., Jr. (2001). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

  • Etzioni, A. (1965). Political unification: A comparative study of leaders and forces. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

  • Fabbrini, S. (2017). Intergovernmentalism in the European Union: A comparative federalism perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(4), 580–597.

    (Video) Liberal reaction to alleged Chinese interference 'very slow,' former ambassador says
  • Forster, A. (2002). Britain and the negotiation of the Maastricht Treaty: A critique of liberal intergovernmentalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(3), 347–368.

  • Giersch, H. (1985). Eurosclerosis. Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 112. Kiel, Germany: Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel.

  • Grieco, J. M. (1990). Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Grieco, J. M. (1995). The Maastricht Treaty Economic and Monetary Union and neo-realist research programme. Review of International Studies, 21, 21–40.

  • Groom, A. J. R., & Taylor, P. (Eds.). (1975). Functionalism: Theory and practice in international relations. London, UK: University of London Press.

  • Groom, A. J. R., & Taylor, P. (Eds.). (1990). Frameworks for international co-operation, London, UK: Pinter.

  • Haas, E. B. (1958), The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Haas, E. B. (1964), Beyond the nation state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Haas, E. B. (1968), The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950–1957 (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Haas, E. B. (1971). The study of regional integration: Reflections on the joy and anguish of pre-theorising. In L. Lindberg & S. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research (pp. 3–43). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Haas, E. B. (1975). The obsolescence of regional integration theory. Research Studies 25. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.

  • Haas, E. B. (1976). Turbulent fields and the theory of regional integration. International Organization, 30(2), 173–212.

  • Handley, D. H. (1981). Public opinion and European integration: The crisis of the 1970s. European Journal of Political Research, 9(4), 335–364.

  • Herz, J. H. (1951). Political realism and political idealism: A study in theories and realities. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

  • Hodson, D. (2011). Governing the euro area in good times and bad. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1963). Discord in community: The North Atlantic area as a partial international system. In F. O. Wilcox & H. F. Haviland (Eds.), The Atlantic community (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Frederick A. Praeger.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1964a). De Gaulle, Europe and the Atlantic Alliance. International Organization, 18(1), 1–28.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1964b). The European process at Atlantic crosspurposes. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 3(2), 85–101.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1982). Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(1), 21–37.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1985). Raymond Aron and the theory of international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 29(1), 13–27.

    (Video) European Integration in 5 Treaties (Pt. 1) | Keys to European Politics | Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks

  • Hoffmann, S. (1989). The European Community and 1992. Foreign Affairs, 68, 27–47.

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2019). Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1113–1133.

  • Jones, E., & Verdun, A. (Eds.). (2005). The political economy of European integration: Theory and analysis. London, UK: Routledge.

  • Kaiser, R. D. (1971). Toward the Copernican phase of regional integration theory. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3): 207–232.

  • Keohane, R. O., & Hoffmann, S. (1990). Conclusions: Community politics and institutional change. In W. Wallace (Ed.), The dynamics of European integration (pp. 276–301). London, UK: Pinter.

  • Keohane, R. O., & Hoffmann, S. (Eds.). (1991). The new European Community: Decision-making and institutional change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

  • Laursen, F. (Ed.). (2005). The treaty of Nice: Actor preferences, bargaining and institutional choice. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

  • Laursen, F. (2006). The Amsterdam and Nice IGCs: From output failure to institutional choice. In A. Verdun & O. Croci (Eds.), The European Union in the wake of eastern enlargement: Institutional and policy-making challenges (pp. 153–173). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

  • Laursen, F. (2016). The founding treaties of the European Union and their reform. Oxford research encyclopedias.

  • Lindberg, L. N. (1963). The political dynamics of European economic integration. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (Eds.). (1971). Regional integration: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Lodge, J. (1984). Book review: Paul Taylor, The Limits of European Integration. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 87–89.

  • Ludlow, N. P. (1999). Challenging French leadership in Europe: Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the outbreak of the empty chair crisis of 1965–1966. Contemporary European History, 8(2), 231–248.

  • Ludlow, N. P. (2006). The European Community and the crises of the 1960s, London, UK: Routledge.

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3): 5–49.

  • McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2009). Intergovernmentalism. The concise Oxford dictionary of politics (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    (Video) The International Economic Order: Old & New (Panel 1)

  • Milward, A. S. (1984). The reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–51. London, UK: Methuen.

  • Milward, A. S. (2000). The European rescue of the nation-state (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

  • Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993a). Introduction: Integration international and domestic theories of international bargaining. In P. B. Evans, H. K. Jacobson, & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Double-edged diplomacy: International, bargaining and domestic politics (pp. 3–42). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Kleine, M. and Pollack, M. (2018) Liberalism and its critics. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1493-1509.

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993b). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Moravcsik, A. (2020). Liberal intergovernmentalism. Oxford research encyclopedia of European Union politics.

  • Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 67–87). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener, T. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds). European integration theory (3rd ed., pp. 64–84). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Nye, J. (1970). Comparing common markets: A revised neofunctionalist model. International Organization, 24(4), 796–835.

  • Pan, W. (2015). Crisis and opportunities: Strengthened European Union economic governance after the 2008 financial crisis. The Hague, The Netherlands: Leiden University.

  • Pentland, C. (1973). International theory and European integration. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Pollack, M. A. (2001). International relations theory and European integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 221–244.

  • Puchala, D. J. (1971). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

  • Puchala, D. J. (1975). Domestic politics and regional harmonization in the European Communities. World Politics, 27(4), 496–520.

  • Puetter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council: New intergovernmentalism and institutional change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–60.

  • Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

  • Rosamond, B. (2016). Fields of dreams: The discursive construction of EU studies, intellectual dissidence and the practice of “normal science.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 16–36.

    (Video) Professor Philip Allott: Curing the Madness of the Intergovernmental World
  • Saurugger, S. (2014). Theoretical approaches to European integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Selecting cases and testing hypotheses. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(1), 164–168.

  • Schild, J. (2012). Shaping Europe: France, Germany and embedded bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to twenty-first century politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [In particular, Chapter 2: “Regularized Bilateral Intergovernmentalism.”]

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). What’s the news in “new intergovernmentalism”? A critique of Bickerton, Hodson, and Puetter. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 723–730.

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1969). Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration. International Organization, 23(1), 161–166.

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1971). A revised theory of international integration. In N. Lindberg & S. A. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research (pp. 232–264). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Taylor, P. (1982). Intergovernmentalism in the European Communities in the 1970s: Patterns and perspectives. International Organization, 36(4), 741–766.

  • Taylor, P. G. (1983). The limits of European integration. London, UK: Croom Helm.

  • Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neofunctionalism: Obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the European Community. Millennium, 20, 1–22.

  • Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (2001). The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization, 55(2), 357–390.

  • Verdun, A. (Ed.) (2002a). The euro: European integration and economic and monetary union. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Verdun, A. (2002b). Why EMU happened—A survey of theoretical explanations. In P. Crowley (Ed.), Before and beyond EMU–View from across the Atlantic (pp. 71–98). London, UK: Routledge.

  • Verdun, A. (2002c). Merging neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism: Lessons from EMU. In A. Verdun (Ed.), European integration theory and economic and monetary union (pp. 9–28). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Verdun, A. (2018). Theories of European integration and governance. In E. Brunet-Jailly, A. Hurrelmann, & A. Verdun (Eds.), European Union governance and policy making: A Canadian perspective (pp. 105–124). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

  • Wallace, H. (1999). Piecing the integration jigsaw together. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(1), 155–159.

  • Webb, C. (1977). Introduction: Variations on a theoretical theme. In H. Wallace, W. Wallace, & C. Webb (Eds.), Policy-making in the European communities (pp. 1–31). London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Webb, C. (1983). Theoretical perspectives and problems. In H. Wallace, W. Wallace, & C. Webb (Eds.), Policy-making in the European communities (pp. 1–41). London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Wiener, A., & Diez, T. (2004). European integration theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Wiener, A., & Diez, T. (2009). European integration theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Wiener, A., Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2019). European integration theory (3d ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Wincott, D. (1995). Institutional interaction and European integration: Towards an everyday critique of liberal intergovernmentalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(4), 127–144.

    (Video) CBC News: The National | Wanted by the FBI, Aerial object search, Indigo cyberattack

  • Wolf, D. (2002). Neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism amalgamated: The case of EMU. In A. Verdun (Ed.), European integration theory and economic and monetary union (pp. 29–49). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Young, O. (1989). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

Videos

1. Theories of integration - Understanding International Relations Theory
(Gay Ingaberg)
2. CBC News: The National | Germany shooting, Chinese visa denied, Israel protests
(CBC News: The National)
3. Freeland replaces Morneau as Trudeau's finance minister | CBC News Special
(CBC News)
4. Trudeau cabinet shuffle brings new faces and changes for run-up to 2019 election
(CBC News)
5. Chris Hedges: The Liberal Class
(The Agenda | TVO Today)
6. Taoiseach Micheál Martin on 'The Centre Will Hold: Liberal Democracy and the Populist Threat'
(University of Oxford)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Last Updated: 02/05/2023

Views: 6023

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Birthday: 1998-01-29

Address: Apt. 611 3357 Yong Plain, West Audra, IL 70053

Phone: +5819954278378

Job: Construction Director

Hobby: Embroidery, Creative writing, Shopping, Driving, Stand-up comedy, Coffee roasting, Scrapbooking

Introduction: My name is Dr. Pierre Goyette, I am a enchanting, powerful, jolly, rich, graceful, colorful, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.